29.2 C
Jammu
Friday, September 20, 2024
HomeOpinionChina Oppressing Tibet by New Education Policy

China Oppressing Tibet by New Education Policy

Date:

Related stories

CEC Gyalson launches Mahindra Thar ROXX MX5 in Leh

Leh, Sept 20: In a significant push for local...

Mega Camp held in village Tangole as part of Rashtriya Poshan Maah Campaign

Kargil, Sept 20: In a significant push towards improving...

Our focus would be on devising strategies against Jaiswal, Gill: Hazlewood

Sydney, Sept 20 (PTI) Australian pacer Josh Hazlewood said...
spot_imgspot_img

Nestled in the heart of the Himalayas, Tibet stands as a region with a rich cultural heritage and a complex socio-political history. Education, a key factor in shaping the future of any community, is no exception in Tibet.

Education Policy and Management in Tibetan Schools. In a broader context, education policy and management in Tibetan schools are explored through academia.edu and a Japan Times commentary. The macro-level decision-making, strategic leadership, and overseeing of educational effectiveness are highlighted. Concerns about the medium of learning, extending the Basic Education Policy (BEP) to 8th grade and the lack of objective research on BEP are noted. Uneven distribution of schools and students in Tibetan settlements is discussed, with decreasing enrolment attributed to a declining fertility rate and parents opting for “better” schools. The closure of smaller schools, impacting students’ well-being is emphasized.

Oppression through Education In September 2023, the Chinese Communist Party implemented Order No.19, known as the Administrative Measures for Religious Activity Venues tightening control over religious institutions in China and occupied regions like Tibet. The law, consisting of 10 chapters and 76 articles claims to standardize religious activity management but contradicts constitutional guarantees of “freedom of religious belief.” Critics argue that it allows Beijing extensive authority to suppress any religion, emphasizing allegiance to the CCP and the socialist system, along with the Sinicization of China’s religions, as outlined in Article 3. The move is seen as a further infringement on religious freedom in various territories.

Tibetan Students Facing Forced Assimilation The Chinese government’s practice of forcing Tibetan students, including preschoolers, into government-run boarding schools due to widespread closures of local schools over the past twelve years. This policy, more prevalent in Tibetan areas, is seen by Tibetan activists as an attempt to assimilate Tibetans into Chinese culture, affecting language, history, and religion. The international community, including the United States, Germany, Czech Republic, and Canada, has criticized the boarding school system, with the U.N. experts committee urging its immediate abolition. China rejects the criticism and plans to respond to U.S. visa restrictions.

The shift to Mandarin Chinese as the primary medium of instruction has sparked debates about the preservation of the Tibetan language and culture. Advocates argue that a strong foundation in one’s native language is essential for academic success and cultural identity. The tension between Mandarin-centric policies and the desire to preserve Tibet’s unique cultural heritage remains a central theme in the education discourse.

The focus on higher education and vocational training has increased in Tibet, aligning with broader national goals for economic development. However, questions arise regarding the relevance of these programs to the unique needs and aspirations of Tibetan students. Balancing traditional knowledge with modern skills is essential for preparing students for diverse opportunities.

Politics behind China’s Education Policy in Tibet. In a recent private letter to the U.N. Mission of China in Geneva, the Special Rapporteurs expressed their worry about the assimilation of Tibetan children into majority Han culture through a mandatory residential school system. The increase in boarding Tibetan students is achieved by closing rural schools populated by Tibetans and replacing them with township or county-level schools using Mandarin Chinese in teaching.

In conclude, the education and policy landscape in present-day Tibet is a complex interplay of cultural preservation, political considerations, and international scrutiny. The forced assimilation policies, especially in the context of education, have raised significant human rights concerns, prompting responses from the United Nations and the United States. The efforts of the Tibetan Education Department to finalize textbooks and address challenges in education policy and management underscore the ongoing struggle to strike a balance between cultural preservation and political realities.

As the international community continues to monitor and respond to developments in Tibet, the call for understanding and dialogue remains essential in addressing the challenges faced by individuals and government officials in the region.

Share this

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img