By Ken Livingstone
The politics of the post-cold war period were originally dominated by the famous claim of Francis Fukuyama that we had reached “the end of history” — neoliberalism was now the only game in town and in the words of our own champion of Chicago school economics, there was “no alternative” to letting the market run riot.
All of us who believe in prioritising the future of people and planet ahead of private profit owe a huge debt of thanks to left forces in Latin America for providing the first major challenge to this doctrine.
In addition to the remarkable survival of the Cuban revolution, the turn of the century saw what became known as the “pink tide” — the election of numerous governments across the region which shared a common commitment to addressing the needs of the majority and ending the days of being treated as the “back yard” of the US.
The importance of Bolivia’s role in this process should never be understated. Coming off the back of a mass struggle against US-backed attempts to destroy the country’s cocoa plants, the election of Movement for Socialism (MAS) candidate Evo Morales as president in 2006 represented a radical new direction.
The days of economic policy being set by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund were brought to a swift end, with government programmes helping reduce poverty and extreme poverty by 25 per cent and 43 per cent respectively.
Predictably, these policies meant the government made powerful enemies at home and abroad. Within two years a recall referendum was held, in which Morales secured over 67 per cent of the vote. Right-wing groups responded to this with a programme of destabilisation intended to remove the government, culminating in a massacre in which 12 indigenous supporters of MAS were killed.
It was later revealed that the US government provided $4.5 million (£3.3m) to those at the heart of this attempted coup. Attempts to undermine the MAS administration never ended: Morales was notably even forced to land in Austria in 2013 when France, Italy and Spain denied a presidential flight access to their airspace after he had indicated a willingness to offer asylum to National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden.
Threats of violence from sections of the Bolivian military prompted Morales to resign. What followed was an “interim government” which served as an example of the reactionary, brutal reality of “regime change” in Latin America. Within months of coming to power, the coup administration granted immunity to members of the security forces responsible for the deaths of 19 protesters who had been rallying in support of their elected president.
Over 200 Cuban doctors were kicked out of the country, just months before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, and ministers eagerly embarked on privatisations. Despite initially claiming to be focused on facilitating new elections, they were committed to overseeing a destruction of the legacy of the previous 13 years.
Despite several attempts to further delay them (and block any MAS candidate from standing), these mobilisations ultimately forced new presidential elections. Support for the coup regime was so low that the incumbent Jeanine Anez withdrew, urging a right-wing alliance in support of former president Carlos Mesa.
But once again, ordinary Bolivians made themselves heard and a year ago this month MAS’s Luis Arce was elected with over 55 per cent of the vote in the first round. Since gaining office, he has sought to restore and build on the gains made when the party was previously in power: launching a bold wealth tax and financial support to over four million citizens to help eliminate hunger. (IPA)
